C# 程序内存泄漏的诱发因素有很多,但从顶层原理上来说,就是该销毁的 用户根 对象没有被销毁,从而导致内存中意料之外的对象无限堆积,导致内存暴涨,最终崩溃,这其中的一个用户根就是 终结器队列,这一篇我们就来看下如何让 PerfView 配合 WinDbg 双剑合璧。
为了模拟 终结器内存泄漏,我们故意在 析构函数 中执行复杂的逻辑,让析构过程足够的慢,这样可以实现 分配速度 远大于 销毁速度 ,达到消费能力不足引发的内存暴涨, 参考如下代码:
internal class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Task.Run(Add); Console.ReadLine(); } static void Add() { for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) { var person = new Person() { Name = $"jack{i}", Age = i }; } } } public class Person { public string Name { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } ~Person() { Thread.Sleep(new Random().Next(0,3000)); Console.WriteLine($"name={Name} 已析构了哦 ..."); } }当分配操作结束后,用 WinDbg 附加到进程中,使用 !fq 查看内存情况,输出如下:
0:015> !fqSyncBlocks to be cleaned up: 0Free-Threaded Interfaces to be released: 0MTA Interfaces to be released: 0STA Interfaces to be released: 0----------------------------------generation 0 has 28423 finalizable objects (000000001BF5B108->000000001BF92940)generation 1 has 4 finalizable objects (000000001BF5B0E8->000000001BF5B108)generation 2 has 21 finalizable objects (000000001BF5B040->000000001BF5B0E8)Ready for finalization 971560 objects (000000001BF92940->000000001C6FC280)Statistics for all finalizable objects (including all objects ready for finalization): MT Count TotalSize Class Name00007ffdbaa2f410 4 96 System.WeakReference00007ffdbaa4f368 2 112 System.Threading.ThreadPoolWorkQueueThreadLocals00007ffdbaa4c640 1 168 System.Diagnostics.Tracing.FrameworkEventSource00007ffdbaa417b8 1 168 System.Diagnostics.Tracing.NativeRuntimeEventSource00007ffdbaa4a158 1 176 System.Threading.Tasks.TplEventSource00007ffdbaa05650 3 216 System.Threading.Thread00007ffdbaa240a8 1 320 System.Diagnostics.Tracing.RuntimeEventSource00007ffdbaa24ac8 8 896 System.Diagnostics.Tracing.EventSource+OverideEventProvider00007ffdbaa4fb58 999987 31999584 ConsoleApp2.PersonTotal 1000008 objects从上面的 Ready for finalization 971560 objects 中可以看到,当前有 9.7w 的对象正在排队等待 Finalizer 线程执行,既然它可以执行,为什么执行这么慢呢? 这时候就需要调查下 Finalizer Thread 此时正在干嘛。
0:001> !tThreadCount: 7UnstartedThread: 0BackgroundThread: 6PendingThread: 0DeadThread: 0Hosted Runtime: no Lock DBG ID OSID ThreadOBJ State GC Mode GC Alloc Context Domain Count Apt Exception 0 1 4f98 000000000058C270 2a020 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 00000000005814e0 1 MTA 5 2 3f4c 000000001AA94090 202b220 Preemptive 00000000088A9D60:00000000088A9FD0 00000000005814e0 0 MTA (Finalizer) 7 3 24b8 000000001AA986D0 102a220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 00000000005814e0 0 MTA (Threadpool Worker) 11 4 5520 000000000056F580 1029220 Preemptive 00000000088A5100:00000000088A5FD0 00000000005814e0 0 MTA (Threadpool Worker) 12 5 1004 000000001AB26160 1029220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 00000000005814e0 0 MTA (Threadpool Worker) 13 6 58a8 000000001B6D35D0 21220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 00000000005814e0 0 Ukn 14 7 5b8 000000001B650820 1029220 Preemptive 0000000000000000:0000000000000000 00000000005814e0 0 MTA (Threadpool Worker) 0:001> ~~[3f4c]sntdll!NtDelayExecution+0x14:00007ffe`8908c634 c3 ret0:005> !clrstack OS Thread Id: 0x3f4c (5) Child SP IP Call Site000000001ACEF868 00007ffe8908c634 [HelperMethodFrame: 000000001acef868] System.Threading.Thread.SleepInternal(Int32)000000001ACEF960 00007ffe19f0c46b System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(Int32) [/_/src/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Threading/Thread.CoreCLR.cs @ 259]000000001ACEF990 00007ffdba986e15 ConsoleApp2.Person.Finalize() [D:\net6\ConsoleApp1\ConsoleApp2\Program.cs @ 31]000000001ACEFCE0 00007ffe1a4a6c06 [DebuggerU2MCatchHandlerFrame: 000000001acefce0] 从输出中可以看到,终结器线程正在 Sleep() 函数,如果你有源码的话,可以看下 ConsoleApp2.Person.Finalize() 中的具体业务逻辑,如果没有源码的话,可以使用 !U 00007ffdba986e15 反汇编下方法源码。
0:005> !U 00007ffdba986e15Normal JIT generated codeConsoleApp2.Person.Finalize()ilAddr is 00000000023920E0 pImport is 0000000002FFF460Begin 00007FFDBA986DA0, size e9D:\net6\ConsoleApp1\ConsoleApp2\Program.cs @ 31:00007ffd`ba986dd4 48b998b4a6bafd7f0000 mov rcx,7FFDBAA6B498h (MT: System.Random)00007ffd`ba986dde e85d0ab25f call coreclr!JIT_TrialAllocSFastMP_InlineGetThread (00007ffe`1a4a7840)00007ffd`ba986de3 488945f8 mov qword ptr [rbp-8],rax00007ffd`ba986de7 488b4df8 mov rcx,qword ptr [rbp-8]00007ffd`ba986deb e848fdffff call 00007ffd`ba986b38 (System.Random..ctor(), mdToken: 00000000060015AB)00007ffd`ba986df0 488b4df8 mov rcx,qword ptr [rbp-8]00007ffd`ba986df4 33d2 xor edx,edx00007ffd`ba986df6 41b8b80b0000 mov r8d,0BB8h00007ffd`ba986dfc 488b45f8 mov rax,qword ptr [rbp-8]00007ffd`ba986e00 488b00 mov rax,qword ptr [rax]00007ffd`ba986e03 488b4040 mov rax,qword ptr [rax+40h]00007ffd`ba986e07 ff5030 call qword ptr [rax+30h]00007ffd`ba986e0a 8945f4 mov dword ptr [rbp-0Ch],eax00007ffd`ba986e0d 8b4df4 mov ecx,dword ptr [rbp-0Ch]00007ffd`ba986e10 e833e7feff call 00007ffd`ba975548 (System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(Int32), mdToken: 0000000006001CD5)>>> 00007ffd`ba986e15 90 nopD:\net6\ConsoleApp1\ConsoleApp2\Program.cs @ 32:00007ffd`ba986e16 488b0c25f0305d12 mov rcx,qword ptr [125D30F0h] ("name=")00007ffd`ba986e1e 48894de8 mov qword ptr [rbp-18h],rcx00007ffd`ba986e22 488b4d10 mov rcx,qword ptr [rbp+10h]00007ffd`ba986e26 e89dcfffff call 00007ffd`ba983dc8 (ConsoleApp2.Person.get_Name(), mdToken: 0000000006000004)00007ffd`ba986e2b 488945e0 mov qword ptr [rbp-20h],rax00007ffd`ba986e2f 4c8b0425f8305d12 mov r8,qword ptr [125D30F8h] ("")00007ffd`ba986e37 488b4de8 mov rcx,qword ptr [rbp-18h]00007ffd`ba986e3b 488b55e0 mov rdx,qword ptr [rbp-20h]00007ffd`ba986e3f e864d7feff call 00007ffd`ba9745a8 (System.String.Concat(System.String, System.String, System.String), mdToken: 0000000006000705)00007ffd`ba986e44 488945d8 mov qword ptr [rbp-28h],rax00007ffd`ba986e48 488b4dd8 mov rcx,qword ptr [rbp-28h]00007ffd`ba986e4c e8cf99ffff call 00007ffd`ba980820 (System.Console.WriteLine(System.String), mdToken: 0000000006000081)00007ffd`ba986e51 90 nop00007ffd`ba986e52 90 nop00007ffd`ba986e53 eb00 jmp 00007ffd`ba986e5500007ffd`ba986e55 488bcc mov rcx,rsp00007ffd`ba986e58 e808000000 call 00007ffd`ba986e65 (ConsoleApp2.Person.Finalize(), mdToken: 0000000006000008)00007ffd`ba986e5d 90 nopD:\net6\ConsoleApp1\ConsoleApp2\Program.cs @ 33:00007ffd`ba986e5e 90 nop00007ffd`ba986e5f 488d6500 lea rsp,[rbp]00007ffd`ba986e63 5d pop rbp00007ffd`ba986e64 c3 ret最终我们找到了问题原因,在真实项目中肯定不会这么简单的,往往会执行一个复杂的逻辑,接下来我们就有一个好奇点了,那个 复杂的逻辑 会大概执行多久呢?
因为 dump 只是一个静态快照,所以从 dump 中寻找的路子就封死了,那有没有方案呢? 肯定有啦,让 PerfView 大威天龙。
在 CoreCLR 中有一些监控 Finalizer Thread 线程的 ETW 事件,具体是:
1)FinalizersStart 事件
2)FinalizerObject 事件
3)FinalizersStop 事件
当一个对象准备析构时,会触发 FinalizerObject ETW事件,所以观察对象之间的析构间隔,大概就能看出大致的 耗费时间。
知道原理之后,接下来打开 PerfView,使用默认设置,启用 Collect -> Collect 收集,然后把应用程序跑起来,运行一段时间后,点击 Stop Collection ,在生成的 zip 面板中点击 Event ,搜索 Finalize 关键词,截图如下:

从图中可以看到,TypeName 列都是 Person 对象,而且从 Time MSec 时间戳上可以观察到 Person 和 Person 之间相隔 s 级以上,起码说明析构函数 执行真的很慢。